AS268069 SPACE TECNOLOGIA LTDA π§π· BR
SPACE TELECOMUNICACAO EIRELI. Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
2,048 (8 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 Γ /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
14
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS268069
- Name
- SPACE TECNOLOGIA LTDA
- Organisation
- SPACELINK
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-12-12
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RADB::AS268069:AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS
- Website
- http://spacelink.net.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/19280
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS262999 IVI TECNOLOGIA E COMUNICAΓΓO LTDA | π§π· BR | 311 | 3 | 13 | inferred |
| AS263880 WANTEL TECNOLOGIA LTDA. Β EPP | π§π· BR | 82 | 28 | 992 | CAIDA |
| AS263292 JR TELECOM | π§π· BR | 15 | 11 | 691 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS270864 NORMA LUCIA DA SILVA ME | π§π· BR | 7 | 2 | 357 | CAIDA |
| AS265323 SPEEDMAX PROVEDOR LTDA | π§π· BR | 2 | 4 | 276 | CAIDA |
| AS271120 INFONET TELECOM COM E SERVICOS DE INTERNET LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 4 | 265 | CAIDA |
| AS263163 JR LINK PROVEDOR DE INTERNET VIA RARIO LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 8 | 225 | CAIDA |
| AS270739 CM TELECOM | π§π· BR | 0 | 2 | 156 | CAIDA |
| AS271584 ACM Provedor de Internet | π§π· BR | 0 | 3 | 147 | CAIDA |
| AS268718 TOTAL NET PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 5 | 18 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.