AS2685 AT&T Enterprises, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 39 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
37
101,376 (396 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
10
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS2685
Name
AT&T Enterprises, LLC
Organisation
AT&T Canada
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
1993-06-02
Network type
NSP
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-ATT2685-REG
PeeringDB
net/672
Exchanges
3
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (5.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 37 no ROA (94.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS7018 AT&T Enterprises, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 23,972 627 1,281 CAIDA
AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 17,556 1,719 3 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,002 235 327 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 21,948 59 4 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,977 45 51 CAIDA
AS852 TELUS Communications Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 298 681 4 CAIDA
AS22652 Videotron Ltee πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 108 154 56 CAIDA
AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 100 22 51 CAIDA
AS1403 EBOX πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 5 223 56 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS11520 Allstate Insurance Company πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2 69 40 CAIDA
AS40703 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2 11 3 CAIDA
AS1313 Adobe Systems Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 11 85 CAIDA
AS3955 Compucom Systems πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 8 85 CAIDA
AS3573 Accenture LLP πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 116 76 inferred
AS53987 Enbridge Pipelines Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 0 15 49 CAIDA
AS25813 HOV Services, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 17 40 CAIDA
AS3958 Air Canada πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 0 21 6 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.