AS268707 4WNET ES TELECOMUNICAÇÕES EIRELE ME 🇧🇷 BR
4W NET ES TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA. Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
1,792 (7 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
11
57,349 × /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
55
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS268707
- Name
- 4WNET ES TELECOMUNICAÇÕES EIRELE ME
- Organisation
- 4WNET AS268707
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2019-02-13
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS268707:AS-4WNET
- Website
- http://www.4wnet.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.4wnet.net.br:8001
- PeeringDB
- net/19341
- Exchanges
- 7
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4230 Claro (Embratel) | 🇧🇷 BR | 36,444 | 81 | 605 | CAIDA |
| AS26615 TIM S/A | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,555 | 1,044 | 132 | CAIDA |
| AS263934 InfoRR Solucoes em Tecnologia | 🇧🇷 BR | 66 | 10 | 269 | CAIDA |
| AS270966 4WNET ES TELECOMUNICAÇÕES EIRELE ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 63 | 0 | 204 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS262663 METROFLEX TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 50 | 97 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS269534 VIANET INFORMATICA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 290 | CAIDA |
| AS266208 Allfiber Telecom Serviços de Telecomunicações | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 8 | 163 | CAIDA |
| AS269485 Araujo Networks Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS270260 M.M.P. PROVEDOR DE ACESSO A INTERNET LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 43 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.