AS269075 GO-NET FIBRA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
2,048 (8 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
2 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS269075
- Name
- GO-NET FIBRA
- Organisation
- marques e santos internet
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2019-06-19
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS269075:AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS
- Website
- https://gonetfibra.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/20156
- Exchanges
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 29,863 | 46 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS53427 TGLOBAL NETWORKS | 🇺🇸 US | 770 | 1 | 77 | CAIDA |
| AS270735 COMPUTIZE NETWORK TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 737 | 2 | 334 | CAIDA |
| AS262740 VELOO NET LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 118 | 64 | 85 | CAIDA |
| AS267079 MUNDO ONLINE | 🇧🇷 BR | 8 | 3 | 109 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,494 | 237 | 103 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 29,181 | 59 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 24,479 | 64 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 19,340 | 45 | 12 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS268126 DGNETSP EIRELI | 🇧🇷 BR | 7 | 3 | 237 | inferred |
| AS270751 RNET TELECOM LTDA ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 6 | 2 | 327 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.