AS269524 Suprema Network Telecom LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
2,048 (8 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS269524
Name
Suprema Network Telecom LTDA
Organisation
Suprema Network Telecom
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2019-11-06
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SUPREMA-NETWORK
PeeringDB
net/21681
Exchanges
2
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS7195 EdgeUno πŸ‡¨πŸ‡΄ CO 35,676 128 630 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,518 236 580 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,923 45 25 CAIDA
AS6057 Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ύ UY 113 576 20 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS16735 Algar Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 30,402 46 26 inferred
AS263047 CORP BR TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA - LINK FULL πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 34 41 6 inferred
AS268155 TRACECOM SOLUCOES EM TI INFRA. E TELECOM. LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 3 338 CAIDA
AS269149 Saracuruna Digital Servicos de Comunicacao Multimi πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 3 233 CAIDA
AS266279 QUALITY TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 186 CAIDA
AS263905 New Group Telecomunicacoes LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 6 163 CAIDA
AS269183 sim telecomunicaΓ§Γ£o e multimidia πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 139 CAIDA
AS269261 NETMAXXI TELECOMUNICACOES E INFORMATICA LTDA EPP πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 12 24 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.