AS271355 NEOTECH PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 8 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
7
3,840 (15 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS271355
- Name
- NEOTECH PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA
- Organisation
- NEOTECH PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2020-09-16
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Tbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS271355:AS-ALL
- Website
- http://neotechprovedor.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/37062
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS61568 ALOO TELECOM - FSF TECNOLOGIA SA | 🇧🇷 BR | 941 | 26 | 765 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,262 | 240 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,460 | 45 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS14840 BR.DIGITAL | 🇧🇷 BR | 4,300 | 82 | 33 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS263880 WANTEL TECNOLOGIA LTDA. EPP | 🇧🇷 BR | 84 | 28 | 30 | inferred |
| AS265360 AGILITY TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 162 | CAIDA |
| AS266109 JereNET Provedor de Internet & Cons em TI LTDA ME. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 110 | CAIDA |
| AS269602 JOSE ARNALDO PINHEIRO DE SOUZA EIRELI-ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 78 | CAIDA |
| AS268971 BETEL TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 46 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.