AS27720 CITTA TELECOM LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 55 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
23
12,800 (50 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
32
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS27720
- Name
- CITTA TELECOM LTDA
- Organisation
- Citta Telecom
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2013-04-22
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-CITTA-ALL
- Website
- http://www.cittatelecom.com.br/
- Looking glass
- http://lg.cittatelecom.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/6256
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 54,910 | 1,564 | 547 | CAIDA |
| AS28663 FLYS INTERATIVA LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,613 | 14 | 499 | CAIDA |
| AS26615 TIM S/A | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,437 | 1,044 | 93 | CAIDA |
| AS22381 SAMM (Megatelecom) | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,353 | 102 | 80 | CAIDA |
| AS52863 UPX TECNOLOGIA LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 489 | 8 | 37 | CAIDA |
| AS262444 XTURBO PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 12 | 49 | 284 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,090 | 185 | 655 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,796 | 45 | 55 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS263584 WanHouse Solucoes em Tecnologia LTDA - EPP | 🇧🇷 BR | 2 | 8 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS28336 Dekanet Comunicação MultimÃdia Ltda. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 126 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.