AS28292 ENGEPLUS INFORMATICA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 43 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
36
32,768 (128 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
7
1.2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS28292
Name
ENGEPLUS INFORMATICA LTDA
Organisation
Engeplus Telecom
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2007-05-16
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RADB::AS-ENGEPLUS
PeeringDB
net/6220
Exchanges
3
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

43 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,509 64 1 inferred
AS263444 Open X Tecnologia Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 21,679 11 401 CAIDA
AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 20,689 92 127 CAIDA
AS14840 BR.DIGITAL πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 4,092 82 1,212 CAIDA
AS28283 Adyl Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 521 8 180 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 32,534 59 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,680 45 47 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS61868 NETFACIL INTERNET VIA RADIO E INFORMATICA LTDA - M πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 5 3 CAIDA
AS268371 COOPERA TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 84 CAIDA
AS264414 Netvale Internet Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 48 CAIDA
AS52775 TecleNet Solucoes Tecnologicas πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 42 CAIDA
AS263425 ANJO QUIMICA DO BRASIL LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 25 CAIDA
AS52910 A. Angeloni & Cia Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 17 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.