AS28352 NETSPEED LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
29
32,256 (126 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS28352
- Name
- NETSPEED LTDA
- Organisation
- Netspeed Brazil
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2007-09-27
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-NETSPEED
- Website
- https://www.netspeedbr.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/8438
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 24,363 | 46 | 757 | CAIDA |
| AS22381 SAMM (Megatelecom) | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,355 | 102 | 428 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 29,959 | 59 | 21 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,050 | 64 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,771 | 45 | 48 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS267543 DAM Solutions | 🇧🇷 BR | 2 | 3 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS265227 TITAN TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 6 | 264 | CAIDA |
| AS61796 NS Internet Ltda ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 152 | CAIDA |
| AS52897 Sulminasnet Provedor de Internet Ltda | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 50 | CAIDA |
| AS263676 NetMG Informática Ltda. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 8 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS263457 Alpinet Informática Ltda | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 9 | 41 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.