AS2857 Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE

Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
332,800 (1,300 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS2857
Name
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Organisation
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Country
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
1993-12-27
Network type
Educational/Research
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-RLP-NET
Looking glass
http://www.rlp-net.net
PeeringDB
net/1641
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 11 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,557 3,985 94 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 52,971 185 489 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 45 0 4 inferred
AS8365 Man-da.de GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 21 6 85 CAIDA
AS56662 Marcin Gondek πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 0 4 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 50,061 18 10 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,305 85 10 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 15,669 48 41 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,976 45 11 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 16 8 11 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 0 1 11 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS199578 Rheinland-Pfaelzische Technische Universitaet Kaiserslautern-Landau πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 2 4 263 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.