AS29063 Eviden Netherlands B.V. 🇳🇱 NL

Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
15
93,696 (366 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
4,096 × /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS29063
Name
Eviden Netherlands B.V.
Organisation
Eviden Netherlands B.V.
Country
🇳🇱 NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2003-05-22

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

8 valid (50.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 8 no ROA (50.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 23,821 0 166 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 1,157 21 99 CAIDA
AS198949 Radware 🇮🇱 IL 568 233 84 CAIDA
AS5400 British Telecommunications (International) 🇬🇧 GB 309 86 222 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 238 567 11 inferred
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 46 0 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,580 185 85 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,347 85 15 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,626 64 16 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 16,059 131 17 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,709 45 17 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA 🇧🇪 BE 144 49 16 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 14 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON 🇫🇷 FR 10 2 16 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 0 7 16 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS31612 Agfa Gevaert NV 🇧🇪 BE 0 5 42 CAIDA
AS29519 Eviden Netherlands B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS25599 Eviden Netherlands B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 0 1 42 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.