AS29124 Iskratelecom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 50 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
49
167,424 (654 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
11
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS29124
Name
Iskratelecom JSC
Organisation
Seven Sky
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2003-06-11
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
200-300Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-7SKY
PeeringDB
net/16278
Exchanges
5
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

50 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 57,402 241 19 inferred
AS31133 PJSC MegaFon πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 26,698 493 787 CAIDA
AS20764 CJSC RASCOM πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 25,443 8 1,345 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 24,283 64 56 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 24,078 45 59 CAIDA
AS50629 LWLcom GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 20,478 24 4 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,301 40 9 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 203 25 3 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 10 4 56 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS28891 CJSC City Telecom πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 3 3 16 CAIDA
AS31514 - 2 0 16 CAIDA
AS199634 Yedinaya Setevaya Kompaniya Ltd πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 3 126 CAIDA
AS30784 Iskratelecom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS56935 Clinic of Aesthetic Medicine CJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS56678 LLC "Gydrozo" πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 1 40 CAIDA
AS50283 Buisiness Kvartal Nov Ltd. πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 2 2 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.