AS30536 Circle Computer Resources, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 86 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
71
42,752 (167 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
15
2,310 Γ— /48
Upstreams
12
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS30536
Name
Circle Computer Resources, Inc.
Organisation
CCR
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2011-02-25
Network type
NSP
Scope
North America
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-CCR
Website
https://ccr.net
PeeringDB
net/14721
Exchanges
1
Facilities
71

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

19 valid (22.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 67 no ROA (77.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 70,977 2,083 112 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,558 3,987 223 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,011 235 2,040 CAIDA
AS60068 Datacamp Limited (CDN77 / DataPacket) πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 15,782 420 75 CAIDA
AS10796 Charter Communications Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 378 632 44 CAIDA
AS30058 FDCservers.net πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 176 840 231 CAIDA
AS5056 Aureon Network Services πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 117 212 47 CAIDA
AS19754 The Fusion Network, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53 35 44 CAIDA
AS32425 Pixel Factory πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 40 7 47 CAIDA
AS14230 ARK Data Centers LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 24 66 926 CAIDA
AS19366 Fibertown Data Centers πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 13 10 84 CAIDA
AS26029 Sparrow Technology Solutions, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 4 0 41 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS206100 Circle Computer Resources Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 47 CAIDA
AS39946 Chick-Fil-A, Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 4 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.