AS30764 PODA a.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ

Announcing 18 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
16
219,392 (857 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
9 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS30764
Name
PODA a.s.
Organisation
PODA
Country
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2003-11-27
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-PODACZ
PeeringDB
net/16025
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

18 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 68,365 136 564 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,622 3,989 232 CAIDA
AS39392 SH.cz s.r.o. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 15,984 12 105 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,176 185 219 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 21,692 64 39 CAIDA
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 9,396 0 2 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,776 45 29 CAIDA
AS1764 Next Layer Telecommunications πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 391 69 14 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 342 19 4 CAIDA
AS47232 ISP Alliance a.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 76 10 27 CAIDA
AS29504 Freenet Liberec, z.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 1 32 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS15425 PODA a.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 8 365 CAIDA
AS197846 Radovan Ochvat trading as SAO Computers πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 2 82 CAIDA
AS50348 KVADOS, a.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 1 35 CAIDA
AS208093 Moravskoslezsky kraj πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 5 23 CAIDA
AS57188 ORKA systems, s.r.o. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 3 21 CAIDA
AS197083 K2 atmitec s.r.o. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 1 1 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.