AS31298 Zulu Ltd. πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG

Announcing 15 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
15
7,936 (31 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS31298
Name
Zulu Ltd.
Organisation
Zulu
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2004-04-07
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS31298:AS-ZULU
Website
https://zulu.bg
PeeringDB
net/21820
Exchanges
2
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 15 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,565 1,894 180 CAIDA
AS34224 Neterra Ltd. πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 23,561 135 151 CAIDA
AS57463 NetIX Communications JSC πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 0 1 169 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,886 237 70 CAIDA
AS20764 CJSC RASCOM πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 25,082 8 17 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,928 64 17 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 23,735 45 17 CAIDA
AS8280 SYNAPSECOM S.A. Provider of Telecommunications and Internet Services πŸ‡¬πŸ‡· GR 23,577 66 17 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,208 130 17 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 20,072 47 4 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,039 40 17 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 796 90 17 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 39 6 17 CAIDA
AS206499 LOCIX LIMITED πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 4 3 2 CAIDA
AS401753 BIXCE Inc πŸ‡»πŸ‡¬ VG 2 1 17 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS57546 Bul Ins AD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 0 3 84 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.