AS3130 RGnet OU πͺπͺ EE
Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
1,024 (4 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS3130
- Name
- RGnet OU
- Organisation
- RGnet
- Country
- πͺπͺ EE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1997-03-17
- Network type
- Non-Profit
- Traffic levels
- 20-100Mbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-RG-SEA
- Website
- https://psg.com/psg.com.html
- PeeringDB
- net/856
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 66,375 | 3,955 | 58 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 55,791 | 1,476 | 64 | CAIDA |
| AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. | π―π΅ JP | 22,289 | 237 | 15 | CAIDA |
| AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited | π¬π§ GB | 15,422 | 13 | 4 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 54,951 | 185 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 51,966 | 18 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,870 | 45 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) | π¦πΊ AU | 569 | 201 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. | π¨π¦ CA | 100 | 22 | 4 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS25819 Collier Technologies LLC | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 2 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS32150 DANGA INTERACTIVE | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 1 | 6 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.