AS3130 RGnet OU 🇪🇪 EE
Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS3130
- Name
- RGnet OU
- Organisation
- RGnet
- Country
- 🇪🇪 EE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1997-03-17
- Network type
- Non-Profit
- Traffic levels
- 20-100Mbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-RG-SEA
- Website
- https://psg.com/psg.com.html
- PeeringDB
- net/856
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 67,533 | 3,892 | 59 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 59,074 | 1,721 | 64 | CAIDA |
| AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. | 🇯🇵 JP | 40,387 | 258 | 18 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 57,327 | 241 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 55,282 | 14 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 38,405 | 45 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇭 CH | 38,359 | 40 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) | 🇦🇺 AU | 587 | 201 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. | 🇨🇦 CA | 131 | 21 | 4 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS47065 USC / UFMG PEERING Research Testbed | 🇺🇸 US | 2 | 12 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS25819 Collier Technologies LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS32150 DANGA INTERACTIVE | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 6 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.