AS32181 GigeNET πΊπΈ US
Announcing 45 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
39
51,456 (201 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
3 Γ /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
12
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS32181
- Name
- GigeNET
- Organisation
- GigeNET
- Country
- πΊπΈ US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2004-03-16
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-CQ-GIGENET
- Website
- https://www.gigenet.com
- Looking glass
- https://chi.lg.gigenet.com/
- PeeringDB
- net/3153
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 65,563 | 3,985 | 485 | CAIDA |
| AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 63,069 | 1,809 | 373 | CAIDA |
| AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth | πΊπΈ US | 52,640 | 215 | 635 | CAIDA |
| AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | ππ° HK | 50,466 | 532 | 221 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 53,002 | 235 | 537 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 21,715 | 64 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,977 | 45 | 50 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS204957 ROUTE 95 LLC | πΊπΈ US | 8 | 137 | 116 | CAIDA |
| AS23522 GigeNET | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 8 | 314 | CAIDA |
| AS25720 Honeycomb Internet Services, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 10 | 78 | CAIDA |
| AS395558 Garden State Computing LLC | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 3 | 39 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.