AS3252 Fiberax Networking&Cloud Ltd 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS3252
Name
Fiberax Networking&Cloud Ltd
Organisation
Fiberax Networking & Cloud AS3252
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
1994-09-09
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-FBRX
PeeringDB
net/7758
Exchanges
2
Facilities
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 55,290 14 49 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 53 0 1 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 3 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek 🇵🇱 PL 0 0 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 57,022 241 15 CAIDA
AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom 🇷🇺 RU 30,824 85 6 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,573 1 6 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 24,251 64 2 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 24,045 45 4 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,303 47 30 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 243 575 6 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 4 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 39 6 6 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 3 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 5 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS31445 Fiberax sp. z o.o. 🇵🇱 PL 6 19 28 CAIDA
AS34046 ShieldTelecom, Ltd. 🇸🇨 SC 0 2 26 CAIDA
AS25330 "Fiberax UA" Limited Liability Company 🇺🇦 UA 0 2 13 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.