AS34066 Telappliant Limited 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
11
18,944 (74 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
16
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS34066
Name
Telappliant Limited
Organisation
Telappliant
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2004-10-14
Network type
NSP
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-TELAPPLIANT
PeeringDB
net/4142
Exchanges
4
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

11 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 67,530 3,894 123 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 59,133 1,721 144 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 57,035 241 48 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 38,568 208 8 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,530 1 16 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom 🇷🇺 RU 26,431 591 8 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 24,208 64 8 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 24,001 45 8 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,260 47 24 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) 🇦🇺 AU 585 201 8 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 243 575 8 CAIDA
AS42708 Glesys AB 🇸🇪 SE 98 203 8 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 8 CAIDA
AS29169 GANDI SAS 🇫🇷 FR 48 8 8 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 33 97 8 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 8 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 8 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 10 39 8 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.