AS34086 T-Systems International GmbH 🇩🇪 DE
Announcing 23 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
20
63,488 (248 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS34086
- Name
- T-Systems International GmbH
- Organisation
- T-Systems International
- Country
- 🇩🇪 DE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2004-10-20
- Network type
- Enterprise
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Restrictive
- IRR as-set
- AS34086
- PeeringDB
- net/13218
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG | 🇩🇪 DE | 48,490 | 910 | 534 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 41 | 0 | 4 | inferred |
| AS5605 NetUSE AG | 🇩🇪 DE | 3 | 10 | 231 | CAIDA |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 14 | 2 | inferred |
| AS56662 Marcin Gondek | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 0 | 2 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,491 | 235 | 68 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 28,192 | 85 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,484 | 64 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS15830 Equinix, Inc. | 🇳🇱 NL | 18,259 | 1,080 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,729 | 45 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇠PH | 273 | 566 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. | 🇮🇹 IT | 76 | 25 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS1836 green.ch AG | 🇨🇠CH | 43 | 78 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS34019 Hivane Association | 🇫🇷 FR | 38 | 6 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS212024 Marc Schmitt | 🇫🇷 FR | 0 | 1 | 13 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.