AS34251 LLC IMC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA

Announcing 23 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
23
12,288 (48 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
10
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS34251
Name
LLC IMC
Organisation
IMC
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2004-11-26
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-IMΠ‘
PeeringDB
net/11704
Exchanges
4
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 23 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 52,399 18 186 CAIDA
AS50263 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 21,377 1 35 CAIDA
AS28917 Fiord Networks, UAB πŸ‡±πŸ‡Ή LT 21,311 10 62 CAIDA
AS3255 Ukrainian Academic and Research Network πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 554 279 138 CAIDA
AS35297 Dataline LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 538 18 383 CAIDA
AS57455 Filanco Ukraine Ltd. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 48 2 848 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,451 236 205 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,891 45 19 CAIDA
AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,777 347 14 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24593 Astelnet LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 3 1 3 CAIDA
AS44827 Bravoport Ltd πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 22 594 CAIDA
AS31158 Asgard LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 9 204 CAIDA
AS198720 MOBICOM Ltd. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 8 118 CAIDA
AS42556 TOV "AirPort" πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 5 92 CAIDA
AS25174 Osokorky Online LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 3 84 CAIDA
AS29496 Link-Service Ltd. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 2 52 CAIDA
AS8461 Astelnet LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 1 8 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.