AS35032 LLC SIP "NIS" 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 30 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
18
31,232 (122 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
12
8 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS35032
- Name
- LLC SIP "NIS"
- Organisation
- NIS
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2005-05-23
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-TAHION
- Website
- http://samaralan.ru
- PeeringDB
- net/17305
- Exchanges
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 69,191 | 108 | 111 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,367 | 18 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom | 🇷🇺 RU | 27,463 | 85 | 138 | CAIDA |
| AS12389 PJSC Rostelecom | 🇷🇺 RU | 25,856 | 3,269 | 333 | CAIDA |
| AS57304 RETN Russia | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,482 | 7 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,015 | 590 | 99 | CAIDA |
| AS60764 Telecom Samara LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 30 | 8 | 463 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 25,913 | 64 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,868 | 45 | 29 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 20,786 | 131 | 34 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 704 | 90 | 29 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 18 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS47257 Varnoff Ltd. | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.