AS35048 Biterika Group LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 199 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
154
53,251 (208 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
45
69 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS35048
- Name
- Biterika Group LLC
- Organisation
- Biterika Group LLC
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2019-05-22
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 21,484 | 40 | 1,811 | CAIDA |
| AS50509 Transroute.Net | 🇷🇺 RU | 854 | 4 | 2,630 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,738 | 185 | 1,465 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 27,081 | 1 | 96 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,875 | 64 | 275 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,152 | 131 | 176 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,541 | 35 | 52 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇭 CH | 15,528 | 37 | 96 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,870 | 45 | 246 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 434 | 89 | 202 | CAIDA |
| AS50629 LWLcom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 408 | 24 | 100 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 206 | 25 | 133 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 202 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS214574 Biterika Group LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 29 | 764 | CAIDA |
| AS47913 Moshonkin Ilia Sergeevich | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 16 | 736 | CAIDA |
| AS48030 Martynova Irina Nikolaevna | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 6 | 276 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.