AS35258 akquinet outsourcing gGmbH 🇩🇪 DE

Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
9,728 (38 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
8.1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS35258
Name
akquinet outsourcing gGmbH
Organisation
akquinet outsourcing gGmbH
Country
🇩🇪 DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2005-07-04
Network type
NSP
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-AKQUINET
PeeringDB
net/6596
Exchanges
5
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

12 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 68,919 134 166 CAIDA
AS8220 COLT 🇬🇧 GB 46,744 155 102 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 41 0 2 inferred
AS9211 Nawork Internet Informationssysteme GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 20 17 338 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 4 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,981 235 49 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,223 85 11 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,762 64 1 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,719 48 4 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 5,033 45 15 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 271 567 5 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 1 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 13 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG 🇨🇭 CH 19 14 4 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 13 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 15 CAIDA
AS34800 Securebit AG 🇨🇭 CH 0 1 11 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS211656 Kuehne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG 🇩🇪 DE 0 9 120 CAIDA
AS201856 HKL BAUMASCHINEN GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 0 1 80 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.