AS36182 Accretive Networks πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
1,536 (6 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
10
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS36182
Name
Accretive Networks
Organisation
Accretive Networks - AMS
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2017-12-08
Network type
Content
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RADB::AS-ACCRETIVE
PeeringDB
net/16742
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 3 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 70,139 109 39 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,651 1,909 6 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 59,142 1,721 18 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 55,323 14 18 CAIDA
AS6830 Liberty Global Europe Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 34,265 167 6 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 39 6 3 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS4657 StarHub Ltd πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 38,584 208 3 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 30,571 1 3 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 26,476 591 3 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 24,254 64 3 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 24,049 45 3 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,448 130 6 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 20,287 62 3 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 3 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 10 39 3 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 3 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.