AS38712 TelNET Communication Ltd 🇧🇩 BD
Announcing 47 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
45
26,880 (105 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS38712
- Name
- TelNET Communication Ltd
- Organisation
- Telnet Communication Limited
- Country
- 🇧🇩 BD
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2007-08-27
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS-TELNET-BD
- Website
- http://telnet.com.bd/
- PeeringDB
- net/13537
- Exchanges
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS58717 Summit Communications Ltd | 🇧🇩 BD | 2,551 | 57 | 1,111 | CAIDA |
| AS58656 bdHUB Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 1,557 | 25 | 212 | CAIDA |
| AS58682 Level3 Carrier Ltd. | 🇧🇩 BD | 608 | 19 | 1,131 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS151479 Digital Payments Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 3 | 94 | CAIDA |
| AS64092 IT Consultants PLC | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 4 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS63851 Bank Alfalah Ltd. | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 3 | 90 | CAIDA |
| AS58935 LankaBangla Information System Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 2 | 65 | CAIDA |
| AS141345 Modhumoti Bank Ltd. | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 2 | 29 | CAIDA |
| AS139599 Perfetti Van Melle Bangladesh Private Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 1 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS135584 Perfetti Van Melle Bangladesh Private Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 1 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS150668 Shanta Securities Limited | 🇧🇩 BD | 0 | 2 | 17 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.