AS38949 Trestel SK, a.s. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
4,608 (18 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
14
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS38949
Name
Trestel SK, a.s.
Organisation
Trestel SK
Country
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2005-11-17
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
1-5Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-TRESTEL-SK
PeeringDB
net/16527
Exchanges
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,942 3,975 206 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,012 185 865 CAIDA
AS31230 SIX.SK Route Servers πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 264 0 2 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,708 45 13 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 341 19 3 CAIDA
AS15935 ha-vel internet s.r.o. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 32 13 6 CAIDA
AS29504 Freenet Liberec, z.s. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ CZ 0 1 14 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS34820 DELTA ONLINE spol. s r.o. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 4 10 350 CAIDA
AS199330 CentralNic Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 3 1 6 CAIDA
AS60890 CentralNic Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 3 1 1 inferred
AS204384 LLC "OTT UKRAINE" πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 34 176 CAIDA
AS61335 PE Denis Podolskii πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 0 2 120 CAIDA
AS206804 EstNOC OU πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺ EE 0 58 94 CAIDA
AS60585 SITEL-VSAT sro πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 0 1 84 CAIDA
AS29531 VM Telecom, s.r.o. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 0 2 73 CAIDA
AS48473 Towercom a.s. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° SK 0 6 23 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.