AS393442 United Electric Cooperative πΊπΈ US
Announcing 106 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
106
116,224 (454 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS393442
- Name
- United Electric Cooperative
- Organisation
- United Electric Cooperative
- Country
- πΊπΈ US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2014-05-14
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- ARIN::AS-UNITEDFIBER-CUSTOMERS
- Website
- https://unitedfiber.com
- PeeringDB
- net/19520
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 65,564 | 3,985 | 2,029 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 52,987 | 235 | 2,408 | CAIDA |
| AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited | π¬π§ GB | 15,632 | 13 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS17303 Network Advisors, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 8 | 14 | 82 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS62943 Missouri Network Alliance, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 69 | 96 | 3 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS395129 United Electric Cooperative | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 9 | 227 | CAIDA |
| AS47078 Heartland Regional Medical Center | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 1 | 45 | CAIDA |
| AS398903 Double K Technologies, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 1 | 40 | CAIDA |
| AS19866 News-Press & Gazette Company | πΊπΈ US | 0 | 1 | 16 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.