AS394968 Quality Technology Services, LLC 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
5,120 (20 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS394968
- Name
- Quality Technology Services, LLC
- Organisation
- QTS Chicago
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2016-03-04
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-QTS-394968
- PeeringDB
- net/11612
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,453 | 2,088 | 15 | CAIDA |
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,807 | 132 | 77 | CAIDA |
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 66,164 | 3,955 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,738 | 185 | 874 | CAIDA |
| AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 19,929 | 2,400 | 47 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS12243 Waddell Solutions Group LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 2 | 7 | 178 | CAIDA |
| AS17094 Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 10 | 215 | CAIDA |
| AS53866 Omeda Communications | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 3 | 141 | CAIDA |
| AS36475 Zacks Investment Research Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 4 | 94 | CAIDA |
| AS21780 GRIFFITH FOODS INC. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS30643 TTX Company | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 5 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS399981 CRST THE TRANSPORTATION SOLUTION | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.