AS395505 iManage, LLC 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
11
3,072 (12 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS395505
Name
iManage, LLC
Organisation
iManage
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2016-08-30
Network type
Content
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Restrictive
PeeringDB
net/17139
Exchanges
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

1 valid (9.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 10 no ROA (90.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 72,046 2,069 166 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 66,780 3,971 108 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 55,663 229 6 CAIDA
AS4826 Vocus Connect International Backbone 🇦🇺 AU 50,464 162 58 CAIDA
AS1828 PacketFabric / Unitas Global 🇺🇸 US 24,456 122 62 CAIDA
AS33491 Comcast Cable Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 280 82 6 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 55,406 236 47 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 26,250 64 1 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 21,005 40 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 20,870 45 3 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,293 48 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 245 567 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 1 CAIDA
AS64073 Vetta Group 🇳🇿 NZ 65 56 1 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 97 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 1 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 1 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.