AS396253 iboss,inc 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 120 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
82
37,888 (148 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
38
38 × /48
Upstreams
14
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS396253
- Name
- iboss,inc
- Organisation
- iboss Americas
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2017-04-14
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-IBOSS
- Website
- https://www.iboss.com
- PeeringDB
- net/16773
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 17
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,615 | 2,074 | 1,382 | CAIDA |
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,730 | 130 | 1,948 | CAIDA |
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,253 | 3,876 | 658 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 55,942 | 1,618 | 57 | CAIDA |
| AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 55,464 | 124 | 158 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,010 | 235 | 66 | CAIDA |
| AS7195 EdgeUno | 🇨🇴 CO | 35,493 | 128 | 53 | CAIDA |
| AS22381 SAMM (Megatelecom) | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,083 | 102 | 14 | CAIDA |
| AS15830 Equinix, Inc. | 🇳🇱 NL | 18,158 | 1,083 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS18678 INTERNEXA S.A. E.S.P | 🇨🇴 CO | 4,729 | 332 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS262589 SAMM (Internexa) | 🇧🇷 BR | 851 | 65 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS9790 Two Degrees Networks Limited | 🇳🇿 NZ | 164 | 63 | 84 | CAIDA |
| AS33363 Charter Communications, Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 123 | 384 | 122 | CAIDA |
| AS11014 Metrotel | 🇦🇷 AR | 94 | 190 | 38 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.