AS39728 Likhno Dmitriy trading as Luganet πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
17
24,576 (96 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
36
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS39728
Name
Likhno Dmitriy trading as Luganet
Organisation
Luganet
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2006-04-18
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-LUGANET
PeeringDB
net/38723
Exchanges
12
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

17 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 25,085 590 294 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 21,509 40 373 CAIDA
AS201706 SERVICEPIPE LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 1,057 25 462 CAIDA
AS50509 Transroute.Net πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 856 4 701 CAIDA
AS198310 OOO Molniya πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 37 0 144 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,403 185 8 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,879 64 30 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 15,565 35 20 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,874 45 33 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 434 89 33 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 4 29 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS44539 Redi LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 24 20 447 CAIDA
AS29031 Lugansk Telephone Company LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 6 13 38 CAIDA
AS207744 Primak Evgenii Aleksandrovich πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 2 10 523 CAIDA
AS47204 MCS LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 8 168 CAIDA
AS215882 HiperLine LTD πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 4 133 CAIDA
AS39529 Osipenko Alexander Nikolaevich πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 9 74 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.