AS397849 ZOHO 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
17
18,688 (73 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
4 × /48
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS397849
Name
ZOHO
Organisation
Zoho Corp
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2019-08-19
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
North America
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
ARIN::AS397849
PeeringDB
net/11293
Exchanges
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

10 valid (47.6%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 11 no ROA (52.4%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,701 2,082 144 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,784 4,027 183 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,188 1,080 206 CAIDA
AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC 🇺🇸 US 17,259 1,777 55 CAIDA
AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited 🇬🇧 GB 15,166 14 3 CAIDA
AS27224 Equinix, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 8 1 34 CAIDA
AS56201 Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, 🇮🇳 IN 2 34 99 CAIDA
AS205111 ZOHO Corporation B.V 🇳🇱 NL 2 32 32 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,587 236 36 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,584 19 2 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL 🇫🇷 FR 21,671 59 1 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,545 64 5 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 15,272 39 2 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,638 45 9 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) 🇦🇺 AU 568 203 1 CAIDA
AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. 🇨🇦 CA 99 22 8 CAIDA
AS139006 Zoho Corporation PTY LTD 🇦🇺 AU 0 10 8 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.