AS39835 goetel GmbH π©πͺ DE
Announcing 22 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
17
29,696 (116 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
12 Γ /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS39835
- Name
- goetel GmbH
- Organisation
- goetel
- Country
- π©πͺ DE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2006-05-02
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-GOETEL
- Website
- http://www.goetel.de
- PeeringDB
- net/19040
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 57,046 | 241 | 917 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | π©πͺ DE | 30,571 | 1 | 173 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | π§π¬ BG | 53 | 0 | 9 | inferred |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | π§πͺ BE | 0 | 14 | 9 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom | π·πΊ RU | 30,825 | 85 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 24,049 | 45 | 30 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | π©πͺ DE | 20,307 | 47 | 55 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | π΅π PH | 243 | 575 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | π¦πΉ AT | 17 | 7 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS212024 Marc Schmitt | π«π· FR | 0 | 1 | 30 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS205376 Dirk Meyer | π©πͺ DE | 0 | 5 | 287 | CAIDA |
| AS197639 Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG | π©πͺ DE | 0 | 1 | 32 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.