AS39878 Peter Rauter GmbH 🇦🇹 AT

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
8
8,961 (35 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS39878
Name
Peter Rauter GmbH
Organisation
Peter Rauter GmbH
Country
🇦🇹 AT
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2006-05-09
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-RAUTER
PeeringDB
net/11324
Exchanges
4
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 70,140 109 145 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 65,649 1,909 47 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,564 1 305 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 57,026 241 72 CAIDA
AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom 🇷🇺 RU 30,816 85 18 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 24,037 45 18 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 20,433 130 7 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,293 47 54 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS 🇳🇴 NO 20,273 62 7 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 243 575 12 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 18 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 39 6 18 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 8 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 1 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 18 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 0 7 8 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS50920 Kabel Braunau GmbH 🇦🇹 AT 0 11 422 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.