AS39904 MERIT GROUP a.s 🇨🇿 CZ
Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
4,096 (16 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS39904
- Name
- MERIT GROUP a.s
- Organisation
- MERIT GROUP a.s.
- Country
- 🇨🇿 CZ
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2006-05-12
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-MERIT-NIX
- Website
- http://www.meritgroup.cz
- Looking glass
- https://lg.meritnet.cz
- PeeringDB
- net/3993
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16019 Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 163 | 90 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS6855 Slovak Telekom, a.s. | 🇸🇰 SK | 129 | 39 | 87 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 57,022 | 241 | 151 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 24,045 | 45 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS1764 Next Layer Telecommunications | 🇦🇹 AT | 460 | 70 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS8218 Zayo Europe | 🇫🇷 FR | 348 | 19 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS29504 Freenet Liberec, z.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 10 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS199604 OLOMOUCKY KRAJ | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 65 | CAIDA |
| AS47767 Regionalni centrum Olomouc s.r.o. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS205968 GeneralNet s.r.o. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 27 | CAIDA |
| AS205724 T.S.BOHEMIA a.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 3 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.