AS399077 Tcloudnet πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 521 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
508
130,816 (511 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
13
523 Γ— /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS399077
Name
Tcloudnet
Organisation
Tcloudnet
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2020-12-02
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
300-500Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RADB::AS-TCLOUD
PeeringDB
net/25860
Exchanges
7
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

308 valid (59.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 213 no ROA (40.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 66,002 3,984 1,191 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,508 1,525 7,064 CAIDA
AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 51,044 532 8,657 CAIDA
AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 19,913 2,402 376 CAIDA
AS18013 ASLINE LIMITED πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 229 25 2 CAIDA
AS61292 Blix Group AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 0 1 6 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,099 185 3,151 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 51,885 18 92 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 27,007 1 11 CAIDA
AS10099 China Unicom Global πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 23,319 99 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,858 45 510 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 274 567 69 CAIDA
AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 27 68 106 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS400104 Tcloudnet πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 82 CAIDA
AS399945 Aisanie Web Solution Inc πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 40 CAIDA
AS150150 AISANIE DATA SERVICES LIMITED πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 10 33 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.