AS399646 Snaju Development 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 38 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
31
11,264 (44 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
7
1.4 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
10
transit customers observed
Customer cone
24
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS399646
- Name
- Snaju Development
- Organisation
- DartNode.com
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2023-10-27
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS399646
- Website
- https://snaju.com
- PeeringDB
- net/34520
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,634 | 3,987 | 1,655 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,055 | 235 | 84 | inferred |
| AS32097 WholeSale Internet, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 11,601 | 43 | 234 | CAIDA |
| AS35847 Ezee Fiber | 🇺🇸 US | 64 | 73 | 282 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS32595 Liberally Network, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 20 | 4 | 290 | CAIDA |
| AS1050 Onvox LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 90 | CAIDA |
| AS40776 TaoNet | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 3 | 74 | CAIDA |
| AS212532 XIAO YANG WEN RUI | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 2 | 68 | inferred |
| AS205563 Marc Gomez | 🇪🇸 ES | 0 | 1 | 68 | inferred |
| AS63127 TheMaple Inc. | 🇨🇦 CA | 0 | 2 | 40 | CAIDA |
| AS204871 Shihabudheen P K | 🇮🇳 IN | 0 | 0 | 35 | inferred |
| AS200329 Monil Chheda | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 0 | 34 | inferred |
| AS55223 BGP Networks LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 0 | 34 | inferred |
| AS206042 Suhail Haris | 🇦🇪 AE | 0 | 0 | 34 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.