AS400097 National Wi-Fi 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 41 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
1,280 (5 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
36
36 × /48
Upstreams
13
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS400097
- Name
- National Wi-Fi
- Organisation
- NATIONALWIFI
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2021-10-01
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-NATWIFI
- Website
- http://www.nationalwi-fi.com
- PeeringDB
- net/30838
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 72,015 | 2,071 | 180 | CAIDA |
| AS701 Verizon Business | 🇺🇸 US | 57,820 | 958 | 107 | CAIDA |
| AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth | 🇺🇸 US | 54,245 | 228 | 251 | CAIDA |
| AS46887 Zayo (fka. Crown Castle) | 🇺🇸 US | 1,428 | 802 | 230 | inferred |
| AS5650 Verizon (fka. Frontier) | 🇺🇸 US | 782 | 1,026 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS7029 Uniti (fka. Windstream) | 🇺🇸 US | 685 | 2,926 | 33 | inferred |
| AS394437 PS Lightwave | 🇺🇸 US | 140 | 62 | 32 | inferred |
| AS13760 Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 137 | 171 | 34 | inferred |
| AS7459 Astound (fka. Grande) | 🇺🇸 US | 96 | 1,746 | 128 | inferred |
| AS33132 Zayo Bandwidth | 🇺🇸 US | 93 | 49 | 231 | inferred |
| AS19009 Missouri Network Alliance, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 85 | 77 | 37 | inferred |
| AS13876 FiberLight, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 67 | 58 | 32 | inferred |
| AS14051 Fidium | 🇺🇸 US | 23 | 104 | 33 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.