AS400226 StormyCloud Inc 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
2
512 (2 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
256 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
15
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS400226
Name
StormyCloud Inc
Organisation
STORMYCLOUDINC
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2021-11-15
Network type
Non-Profit
Traffic levels
1-5Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-STORMYCLOUD
PeeringDB
net/28625
Exchanges
5
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

3 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited 🇬🇧 GB 20,088 16 2 CAIDA
AS64289 Macarne.com 🇺🇸 US 1,058 7 42 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 44 0 2 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek 🇵🇱 PL 0 0 1 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 55,640 238 36 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 52,549 18 5 CAIDA
AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom 🇷🇺 RU 27,416 85 2 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 26,278 64 2 CAIDA
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 20,860 0 2 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 20,844 45 3 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) 🇦🇺 AU 20,420 202 2 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,259 48 7 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 20,168 40 1 CAIDA
AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. 🇨🇦 CA 347 22 3 CAIDA
AS22652 Videotron Ltee 🇨🇦 CA 111 156 3 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 2 CAIDA
AS1836 green.ch AG 🇨🇭 CH 45 76 2 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 39 6 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 3 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.