AS41480 Systemec BV πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL

Announcing 13 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
11
36,352 (142 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS41480
Name
Systemec BV
Organisation
Systemec
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2006-08-30
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-SYSTEMEC
PeeringDB
net/15039
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

13 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 49,317 907 44 CAIDA
AS6830 Liberty Global Europe Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 27,247 169 121 CAIDA
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 8,006 0 119 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 1,148 21 33 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 268 567 2 inferred
AS8455 atom86 BV πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 244 22 73 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 42 0 4 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,561 235 59 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 27,395 85 9 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 20,784 64 11 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 15,987 129 11 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,776 45 11 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 144 49 9 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 11 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 11 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 11 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.