AS41695 VOSTRON Limited 🇬🇧 GB
Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
2
10,240 (40 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS41695
- Name
- VOSTRON Limited
- Organisation
- Vostron Ltd
- Country
- 🇬🇧 GB
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2006-10-10
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-VOSTRON
- Website
- http://www.vostron.com
- PeeringDB
- net/5102
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,739 | 4,017 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,684 | 235 | 121 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,670 | 64 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 15,441 | 48 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,722 | 45 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 269 | 567 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 170 | 25 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 97 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS50300 CustodianDC Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 9 | 39 | 3 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16568 PROMEGA CORPORATION | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 4 | 38 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.