AS42574 Novaya Sibir Plus Ltd. 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
31
9,728 (38 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS42574
- Name
- Novaya Sibir Plus Ltd.
- Organisation
- Novaya Sibir Plus
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2007-03-14
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-NSPLUS
- Website
- http://gksvyaz.ru/
- PeeringDB
- net/13867
- Exchanges
- 8
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,461 | 590 | 851 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,609 | 32 | 1 | inferred |
| AS48858 JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 🇷🇺 RU | 112 | 5 | 97 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,953 | 235 | 176 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,751 | 64 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS8447 A1 Telekom Austria AG | 🇦🇹 AT | 20,390 | 121 | 31 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,162 | 131 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇭 CH | 15,596 | 38 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,031 | 45 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 418 | 89 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 32 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS47338 MKU TSITiTO | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 1 | 42 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.