AS42632 MnogoByte LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 39 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
34
28,672 (112 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
5 Γ— /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
10
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS42632
Name
MnogoByte LLC
Organisation
MNOGOBYTE
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2007-03-23
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
500-1000Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-MNOGOBYTE
PeeringDB
net/21451
Exchanges
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

39 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 30,490 85 568 CAIDA
AS8359 MTS PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 5,833 436 444 CAIDA
AS8732 JSC Comcor πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 256 17 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,151 185 242 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 51,303 18 149 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,868 64 7 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 21,487 40 2 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 16,147 131 7 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,857 45 27 CAIDA
AS6697 Beltelecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡Ύ BY 1,643 217 40 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 435 89 7 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 206 25 7 CAIDA
AS207351 Transroute Telecom LTD πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 35 0 8 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 4 39 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS41349 Limited Liability Company MVM Technology πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 3 57 CAIDA
AS48158 DigitalOne AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 0 29 41 CAIDA
AS203391 Cloud DNS Ltd πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 0 8 6 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.