AS42668 Nevalink, LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
25,088 (98 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS42668
- Name
- Nevalink, LLC
- Organisation
- Nevalink
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2007-03-29
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-NEVALINK
- Website
- https://www.nevalink.net/
- PeeringDB
- net/27387
- Exchanges
- 5
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 49,838 | 19 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS31133 MegaFon PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 23,745 | 493 | 53 | CAIDA |
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | 🇷🇺 RU | 23,447 | 8 | 28 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 21,116 | 40 | 30 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,792 | 235 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS57304 RETN Russia | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,388 | 6 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,728 | 64 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,074 | 129 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,415 | 33 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,720 | 45 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 416 | 89 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 4 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS39033 Mediaoperator LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 2 | 24 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.