AS42673 Skyware Sp. z o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL

Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
13,312 (52 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
8 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS42673
Name
Skyware Sp. z o.o.
Organisation
Skyware Sp. z o.o.
Country
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2007-03-29
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SKYWARE
PeeringDB
net/7747
Exchanges
2
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

11 valid (91.7%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (8.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 50,103 19 192 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 24,689 1 22 inferred
AS6204 TMRC GROUP SRL πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ RO 20,810 5 2 CAIDA
AS201054 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 17,746 0 2 inferred
AS5617 Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 643 76 415 CAIDA
AS50606 Horyzont Technologie Internetowe sp.z.o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 97 28 3 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,942 45 12 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS206953 CYFROWA FOTO Sp. z o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS203086 Firma Handlowo Uslugowa RuszelNet Lukasz Ruszel πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 2 38 CAIDA
AS215452 SALCAMICO INVESTMENTS Sp. z o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 2 36 CAIDA
AS202337 PROFERIS SP. Z O.O. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 1 30 CAIDA
AS199921 SOORAJ SP. Z O.O. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 1 10 CAIDA
AS200659 Ideo Sp. z o.o. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 1 8 CAIDA
AS47229 Marshal's Office of the Podkarpackie Province πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 1 8 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.