AS43848 Gamsjaeger Kabel-TV & ISP Betriebs GmbH 🇦🇹 AT

Announcing 23 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
23
9,728 (38 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
15
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS43848
Name
Gamsjaeger Kabel-TV & ISP Betriebs GmbH
Organisation
Gamsjaeger
Country
🇦🇹 AT
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2007-10-09
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
1-5Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-GAMSJAEGER
PeeringDB
net/16080
Exchanges
1
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

23 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS28889 LinzNet Internet Service Provider GmbH 🇦🇹 AT 5 15 455 CAIDA
AS204577 LinzNet Internet Service Provider GmbH 🇦🇹 AT 2 1 26 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,986 185 137 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,307 85 22 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,867 1 22 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,712 63 22 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,691 48 88 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,949 45 22 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 22 CAIDA
AS1836 green.ch AG 🇨🇭 CH 43 78 22 CAIDA
AS12859 BIT BV 🇳🇱 NL 38 66 22 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 22 CAIDA
AS15935 ha-vel internet s.r.o. 🇨🇿 CZ 33 13 22 CAIDA
AS44066 firstcolo GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 31 54 1 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 22 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 18 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.