AS43942 Grifonline S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT

Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
4
3,584 (14 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
15
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS43942
Name
Grifonline S.r.l.
Organisation
Grifonline S.r.l.
Country
🇮🇹 IT
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2007-10-23
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
1-5Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
PeeringDB
net/4598
Exchanges
2
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

5 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 69,894 108 76 CAIDA
AS28716 Retelit Digital Services S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 124 45 13 CAIDA
AS197506 Level7 s.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT 3 2 41 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 56,760 237 29 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 38,265 208 3 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,210 1 3 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom 🇷🇺 RU 26,115 591 3 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,905 64 3 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 23,712 45 3 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 20,188 130 3 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 20,019 40 3 CAIDA
AS12859 BIT BV 🇳🇱 NL 58 58 1 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 39 6 3 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 3 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 3 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 10 39 3 CAIDA
AS59919 Brainbox S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT 2 8 3 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 0 7 3 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.