AS44682 SIL-MIRO COM SRL π·π΄ RO
Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
20
7,680 (30 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS44682
- Name
- SIL-MIRO COM SRL
- Organisation
- TFIBER
- Country
- π·π΄ RO
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2008-02-22
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-TELECOMROMANIA
- Website
- http://www.tfiber.ro
- PeeringDB
- net/15284
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | πΊπΈ US | 70,993 | 2,083 | 379 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 50,129 | 18 | 354 | CAIDA |
| AS5483 Magyar Telekom Plc. | ππΊ HU | 74 | 113 | 285 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 52,797 | 185 | 335 | CAIDA |
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | π·πΊ RU | 23,229 | 8 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,980 | 45 | 40 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35450 Dainet Solutions SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 4 | 164 | CAIDA |
| AS49252 SC Prolink System SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 3 | 123 | CAIDA |
| AS35267 Massive Telecom SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 3 | 123 | CAIDA |
| AS31244 MY SERVER MEDIA SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 7 | 70 | CAIDA |
| AS39346 SIL-MIRO COM SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 1 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS35505 Pronet Solutii IT SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 2 | 36 | CAIDA |
| AS47742 SIL-MIRO COM SRL | π·π΄ RO | 0 | 0 | 21 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.