AS44858 PROXSYS B.V. 🇳🇱 NL

Announcing 14 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
13
6,656 (26 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS44858
Name
PROXSYS B.V.
Organisation
PROXSYS
Country
🇳🇱 NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2008-03-20
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS44858:AS-PROXSYS
PeeringDB
net/5089
Exchanges
2
Facilities
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

14 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 16,153 132 164 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 1,174 21 108 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 271 567 14 inferred
AS57866 Fusix Networks B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 174 16 79 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 45 0 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 55,072 185 75 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,659 85 13 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,901 64 15 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS 🇳🇴 NO 15,546 35 13 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,869 45 14 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA 🇧🇪 BE 145 49 13 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 13 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 14 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 14 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON 🇫🇷 FR 10 2 14 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 14 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 0 7 14 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.